DISCLAIMER Some people who may read this are Led Zeppelin fans who are also my friends. You know who you are, but know that these arguments are not directed towards you because you accept my opinions and musical tastes and even give my musical interests a chance, as I did yours. I thank you for respecting my opinions not only as a friend, but as a human being. This disclaimer also applies to others who respect the "Zeppelin-haters" opinions. I thank you all who show respect for us.
First off, I am not going to try to rant about them, it is simply just my personal opinions. If you agree or disagree, feel free to post your opinions in a comment.
First Argument: Led Zeppelin is Overrated.If you are reading this, then I assume you know me enough to know that I am not a fan of much overrated things. (For example to set the idea, on the New Avenged Sevenfold Album, everyone hates the song Lost, but its my favorite song.) Well, at least overrated to the people I know. I may very well be in a mainstream group when compared to everyone, but for all intensive purposes, this argument only applies to people I interact with on a day to day basis.
I like being different. I personally don't see whats wrong with this, but that aside, I enjoy it. Out of all the people I know personally who love the Rock N' Roll genre, every single one loves Led Zeppelin. Now, I don't want to be the same as everyone else. When a discussion about music comes up, discussing Led Zeppelin is inevitable. While everyone else wants to discuss Zeppelin, Cream, and AC/DC, I want to discuss Avenged Sevenfold, Metallica, Iron Maiden, and DragonForce.
Don't get me wrong. This argument has nothing to do with their music, but it does, however, have everything to do with me being true to my unique self. This isn't the entire reason though and in fact, it is probably the weakest argument I make today. If I truly liked Zeppelin, then this idea of uniqueness would be thrown out so I could enjoy something that I like. But I don't enjoy it.
Second Argument: The Lack of ExcitementStairway to Heaven. Dazed and Confused. The Battle of Evermore. Three songs in particular that stick out to me as boring. Like super boring. I can't listen to something that bores me. End of story. To further prove my point, I present you a simple argument:
No one enjoys boredom.
Led Zeppelin causes me boredom.
------- (Therefore)
I do not like Led Zeppelin.
Third Argument: The Hype People hear the names Jimmy Page and Robert Plant and pretty much worship them as if they are gods. They go around saying that they are the greatest and no one compares to them....ever.
See, I do not agree with. Sure, I go around saying Synyster Gates, Kirk Hammet, and Randy Rhoads are amazing, and while I think that Randy is the best ever, I tell everyone that this is my opinion (and Page supporters even say my opinion is wrong, see the final argument). I also go around saying Synyster Gates is amazing, but I also say that he is not the best, but has
potential to go down in history as one of the greats. While I praise those I believe are the best, I also disprove them by looking through the eyes of everyone else (for example, the Synyster Gates line).
While their fans do have the right to admire them and speak greatly of them, as I do with the above mentioned, I do not feel that they have the right to make a fact out of a simple opinion. To make it a fact is impossible as it is personal taste. And by criticizing someone for their tastes being "wrong" because they may not agree with the mainstream's beliefs shows that you would be a hypocrite who doesn't believe in someone having thier own thoughts. Well ladies and gentelmen, thats Communism. Last time I checked, I live in the good old USA, and have the right to speak my mind without persecution (freedom of speech).
Fourth Argument: Robert Plant I hate his voice. It annoys me. I can simply solve this in another, simple argument.
No one likes being annoyed
I am annoyed with Robert Plant's voice.
Robert plant sings for Led Zeppelin
It is impossible to listen to a band without hearing their vocalist (with the exception of instrumental songs)
--------(Therefore)
I do not like Led Zeppelin on the premise that he annoys me and I cannot listen to Led Zeppelin without hearing his voice.
Fifth Argument: Jimmy PageIf you know anything about my friends and I, there is that one sub group in my group of friends that are guitarists. We cannot have one conversation without bringing up a guitarist at one point.
Out of all of said friends, they all believe that Jimmy Page is the best ever. And like I mentioned in argument Four, I think Randy Rhoads is. And even though these other friends listen to music I like, such as Iron Maiden and the Scorpions, they still are true to classic rock (even though I attemped to save them by introducing them to Avenged Sevenfold, which they accept and don't deny thier musical talent, especially Synyster Gates.) Once again, this leads to the first argument of being different and also the second argument by listening to what I like.
Sixth Argument: The StyleI do not like the bluesy style. It is too slow and is boring to me, and once again, as stated in the second argument, I do not like what bores me. One could aruge that I like Slash and Slash has a bluesy style. While I do acknowledge, I can assure you that he is the only bluesy guitarist that I enjoy. The reasons are unknown to me, but he has a style that is different from the classic bluesy styles of Page.
Seventh Argument: Lyrical Content Once again, a personal preference. I do not think that any of their music's lyrical content is amazing. It seems generic to me. Sure, they throw in Lord of the Rings here and there. Big whoop! I personally think that bands like Avenged Sevenfold and DragonForce have much better lyrical content than Zeppelin. Once again, this is a personal preference. Its a simple matter of what interests me. For example, Avenged Sevenfold, during Waking the Fallen and City of Evil, had alot of the Biblical settings. Babylon. Refrencing Chapter Four in the Bible. The Apocalypse. These are all religious icons that appeal to my mideval geeky side. Another example is DragonForce, and I won't go into detail because thier name says it all (and so did my friend Bobby when he called DragonForce "D&D Metal"). If you have the urge to argue that I am wrong, then please stay tuned for the Final Argument.
Eighth Argument: Its a Bandwagon That Everyone Jumped On.......and if you didn't jump on, you are considered less than a human being. Yes, I will accept the fact that even Slash found Jimmy Page to be an influence of his. But look at it this little diagram.
Jimmy Page ---influenced--> Slash ----influenced---> Synyster Gates
Looking at this diagram, how much has it changed? A great deal, mind you. Simply speaking here, yes Zeppelin influenced others who then put their own twist on it, then influenced others who did the same, and so on..... Sure, they may be a common influence, but that does not mean we all have to like their music. I think I may have strayed from my point slightly, but you get the idea.
Ninth Argument: "Without Led Zeppelin, we wouldn't have the music we have today"People say this argument. They then believe that Led Zeppelin are the founders of music. They say that everything we hear today is taken from Led Zeppelin or inspired by it.
Hold on here. Something is wrong. You know what that is?
In case you didn't figure it out, here is my point. What evidence do they have in saying this. Sure, they influenced musicians and started the chain as I showed in the previous argument. But how can you say that another musician wouldn't have came along and revolutionized music in the same way? You can't. If you truly think that no other musician would have done the same thing, then let me ask you this. What evidence do you have? What is the basis of your argument? I thought so...no evidence. If you do happen to find a machine that lets us view alternate realities, give me a buzz. I would love to check out a few things. Then again, this won't happen so you have no basis in saying it wouldn't have happened.
Another argument is that people say modern bands do not pay homage to Led Zeppelin. Who said they had to? Last time I opened the Bible it did not say that on the first day, Led Zeppelin created the universe. No, God created the universe. Without evidence that Zeppelin would have been the only band to revolutionize music of that time, I owe nothing to them and neither do modern bands either. If that make them suck, then so be it. They have thier own fan base and sell their own records without paying homage to the overated Zeppelin. If one has to pay homage to them to be good, then I would love to see how many records you have sold? None? I thought as much. Moving on.
Tenth Argument: The Musical ContentI have been told by others that the musical content of Led Zeppelin is so deep that you need to actually listen carefully to get the genius of it and if you can't, you are not capable of understanding music this amazing. To me, this is a lame cop out. People who argue this are just trying to insult the intelligence levels of those who do not like Zeppelin. Sure, the musical content may be present, but I prefer music I don't need to be on drugs to find amazing.
Final Argument: The PeopleThe final reason I do not like Led Zeppelin is the people who do like Led Zeppelin. If you ask anyone who likes Led Zeppelin about someone who doesn't, their automatic response is one of the following, and I know from experience. Listen carefully, I will disprove every one of them.
-How can you not like Led Zeppelin? Led Zeppelin created music, so you therefore hate music.
-You are just a coward for not liking something that everyone else likes.
-Led Zeppelin Haters are Gay in the literal meaning of the word.
-Plus a cornicopia of others that I can disprove, but will leave out to make this a PG blog.
And for the rebuttal:
-No, they did not creature music. Others, such as Elvis came before them. Do you mean to tell me that Elvis is not music? I think not.
-My exact reply when I heard this one was "WHAT???" If anything, it is the opposite. To dislike what everyone else likes takes serious balls.
-Last time I checked, I am interested in women.
-Once again, I have answers to these ones too, but I am going to keep it clean.
Zeppelin fans are also pompous. They say that anyone who dislikes Zeppelin is not a person. They also go about and say that our opinions are wrong. Let me say it again. OUR OPINIONS ARE WRONG. If it was a textbook fact, then fine, say I am wrong, but show me where it is written by scholars that Led Zeppelin is the greatest ever. Good luck because I am confident that you will not find it anywhere.
If I was put on this planet for more than terrorizing people and being the but of peoples jokes, it was to speak out against the persecution of opinions. In my opinion, people who do this are discriminators, and unlike Zeppelin fans, I will not say you are wrong if you don't agree.
Fans are also arrogant. Even friends of mine say that the Rolling Stones should not be the Rock N' Roll Hall of Fame's Greatest Rock Band of All Time. I mean, yeah, they should. They obviously had some form of support for this. I am sure they didn't say, "Hmm, lets pick a band that no one likes to be the greatest band ever." No, people had to like them over Zeppelin. Fans of Zeppelin argue. And you know why? They cannot deal with the fact that thier false perceptions are showing them what is real, not what they want to see.
Yeah, Zeppelin may have the greatest fan base because of this (an opinion), but they are also the most arrogant and pompous too (once again, an opinion).
The Wrap Up: It's FunI have seen posts in blogs, forums, groups, you name it saying that music today is not music and sucks. Its an opinion. This ties in to the last argument, which is the one I am the most passionate about. But music is meant to be fun. If someone asked my why I like Avenged Sevenfold so much, you know what I would say. I would say:
"I like Avenged Sevenfold because they are amazing. Their song writing skills are genius (opinion) and Syn Gates is an awesome guitarist (opinion). But most of all, their music is fun. I actually enjoy listening to Avenged Sevenfold and am able to easily relax when I hear them (based on emotion.)"
Emotion. Isn't music supposed to appeal to your emotions? Its supposed to be entertaining. If I find it entertaining, then I like it. Once again, another simple argument.
People live for pleasure and absence from displeasure(actually a philosophical argument by John Stuart Mills and his "Greatest Happiness Prinicple")
Avenged Sevenfold causes me happiness when I listen to it.
Happiness is the primary consequence from pleasure.
Led Zeppelin causes me displeasure.
Displeasure's principle consequense is pain (not in the entirely literal sense)
-----(Therefore)
Avenged Sevenfold causes me pleasure, which is what people seek when living and so I will listen to this band because they cause me happiness. I will not listen to Led Zeppelin as they promote displeasure to me.
Lets face it. No one wants pain or displeasure. They want something they enjoy. This is the primary reason I do not like Led Zeppelin. Led Zeppelin annoys me (as stated earlier), which causes me displeasure, but Avenged Sevenfold, Metallica, Iron Maiden, Scorpions, DragonForce, Velvet Revolver, Guns N' Roses.... They all cause me to be happy.
So, if Zeppelin fans think that what I find enjoyable is wrong, who is truly the wrong one. The one who takes refuge in what he likes, or the one that finds people who have different pleasures than himself and crucifies them for their beliefs?
You answer it for yourself, but anyone with morals would say that the second one is wrong.